However, the relative modernity of this technology changes from movie to movie.

James Camerons sequel features higher-spec technology, whileAlien 3reverts to a grimier, less glamorous vision of the future.

To make things more confusing, Ridley Scotts prequels change this setup entirely.

Official theatrical poster for Alien (1979)

While the characters ofPrometheusutilize state-of-the-art technology, Aliens working-class stiffs are saddled with subpar equipment.

Thus,Ridley ScottsAlienprequelsfeature better funding for tech.

It makes sense for Peter Weyland to spare no expense when constructing the titular Prometheus.

Sigourney Weaver’s Ripley from Alien in front of Michael Fassbender’s David from Prometheus

Custom image by Milica Djordjevic

As such, it makes sense for Peter Weyland to spare no expense when constructing the titular vessel.

As such, the movies protagonists enjoy lavish living quarters and state-of-the-art equipment.

The fact that bothAliensandAlien: Romulusutilize the same clunky, retro-futuristic technology reaffirms this reality.

Isabella Merced’s Kay looking terrified in Alien: Romulus trailer-1

Custom image by Milica Djordjevic

This is the angle thatAliens prequel director Ridley Scottwent with when asked about the issue by theBBCin 2012.

PromotingPrometheus, Scott was asked to account for the difference in technology between the original movie and its prequel.

Scott has a good point, since bothAlienandPrometheustake place well into the future and light-years away from Earth.

The Last Engineer and David in Prometheus

Custom image by Milica Djordjevic

Source:BBC

Your Rating

Your comment has not been saved

Movies

Alien

Prometheus